Journals, Student-Led SessionsFinal Projects & Presentations



Note: All submitted work must be typed and double-spaced. Turn in work on time. Late work will be penalized at the rate of one-half letter grade per day of lateness.
Although the writing that you produce in a journal is not meant for the general public, I do have to be able to read your entries with relative ease, so don't simply abandon all concern for proper grammar, spelling, and punctuation.

A critical journal offers a regular opportunity for you to think your way more deeply into the material of the course, to make connections, test out arguments, think through topics for your special project, or plant the seeds for future research. Here are some guidelines and suggestions

  • Write regularly. Date your entries. The number of pages you write in your journals is less important than the evidence your entries provide of serious, sustained inquiry and engagement in the course. Often, however, quality and quantity are interrelated. The more you write, the better you'll get at producing entries that push your thinking forward.

  • Vary the kind of entries you write, but make sure that you keep your focus on the course, the readings, our discussions, and closely related topics. Sometimes the entries might be critical, sometimes creative, as long as you focus on something specific.

  • It is fine to start with your pre-critical, "gut" reactions to the readings, but you need to go on to reflect on these reactions and make them lead you to new insights into yourself as a reader and critic and into how your assumptions affect your response to the works and issues at hand.

  • Ask questions. A good question opens up to other questions that in turn will lead you to new insights. At times you might want to respond at some length to one or two of the questions that you raise here or that were raised in class discussions. You don't have to come up with "definitive" answers. (As Gertrude Stein said, "Shutters shut.") It's often helpful to focus on what you find odd, mysterious, or frustrating about a particular work, passage, scene, or character.

  • Make connections. To do this, you may need to put your ideas in a larger or different context. (Example: "In class today, I was struck by the comment that great American literature, like the Odyssey or even Huck Finn, tends to revolve around the theme of the journey. Is this as true of literature by women writers as it is of that by male writers? Is it as true of contemporary literature coming out of other cultures where mobility may not be seen as desirable or may be virtually impossible?" Here the student has taken an idea and placed it in within a wider context that will allow her to explore, and perhaps to challenge, the claim's validity.)

  • Use some of your journal entries to explore and evaluate relevant websites. Click here to see how to go about evaluating a website.

  • If you wish, your final project may consist of a retrospective journal analysis. To do this project, you would reread the journal guidelines above and your own journal entries over the semester and then construct a short essay (approximately 5 pages in length) in response to the following questions:

      1. In what ways does your journal meet or exceed the guidelines and expectations listed above? What are your journal's strengths? What are its weaknesses and how, given time, might you correct them?
      2. What different kinds of approaches are demonstrated by your journal entries? What other kinds of approaches would you like to try your hand at, if you had time?
      3. Which of your journal entries do you now find the most interesting, and why?
      4. Look over the syllabus, your class notes, and your journal entries. What works or writers, or what questions raised in class, in the public readings, or in your journal would you most like to explore further, if you had time, and why?
[top of page]

Student-Led Sessions

You and a partner will be assigned responsibility for leading 30-40 minutes worth of class discussion for certain sessions. You and your partner are supposed to work together on this collaborative assignment; you're not being asked to give 'solo' performances.

You should think about the readings for these sessions in particular depth and identify several problems, questions, or points of interest which you think the class should address. You also might point out certain lines or passages which you think are especially important and use them to generate discussion.

Xerox copies of your list of problems or questions that you think we should address and distribute them at the beginning of the session. (If this xeroxing is done in the Printing Office, it may be charged to the English Department.)

Student-Led Sessions:
Mon., Sept. 6 - Arundhati Roy
Wed., Sept. 15 - Derek Walcott
Wed., Sept. 29 - Hanan al-Shaykh

Wed., Oct. 6 - Nuruddin Farah
Wed., Oct. 20 - Sindiwe Magona
Wed., Oct. 27 - Ha Jin
Mon., Nov. 8 - Andrei Makine

[top of page]


Final Projects

For the final project you may choose between writing a retrospective journal analysis (approximately 5 pages in length), writing a 7-10 page formal essay, which may be based upon one of your journal entries, creating a webpage relevant to the course, or doing a project that takes some other form (for example, a dramatic performance, a videotape, or series of 'annotated' drawings). Regardless of the form your project takes, some written commentary is required. Depending on the nature of the project, the written commentary may be essentially an expansion of your proposal and your presentation outline.

[top of page]


Presentations

Note:
During the last week of classes, majors who are fulfilling their senior exercise with this course will give a class presentation based on their work. If time and the class size permit, we will try to schedule the rest of the presentations during the last week of class as well. Since these presentations substitute for a final exam, however, it is appropriate for them to take place during final exam week. Also note that majors fulfilling their senior exercise with this course are expected to attend the presentation session for the other students in the class.

Format:
Prepare a 7-10 minute presentation (15-20 minutes for senior exercises) in which you address the items described below (and others, if you wish). If possible, please address these items in the order that follows. This should help you to organize your remarks; it will definitely help us to follow them.

    (1) State what you were trying to explore and why, how you went about it, and what problems you encountered, if any.

    (2) Summarize the discoveries or insights gained through your work on your final project (including insights into the strengths and limitations of your project and your own strengths and limitations, at present, as a reader and writer).

    (3) Discuss what you would do differently, if anything, if you were to do this project again, what else you had hoped to do and did not have time for, and what new ideas for further possible research or experimentation occurred to you while working on this project.

  • Outlines for Presentations: E-mail an outline of your remarks to the rest of us at least 24 hours before the presentations are to take place. The point of this part of the assignment is to encourage you to give a well-organized presentation and to provide us with a sneak preview of sorts, so that we might be thinking of questions to ask you during the discussion session after your presentation.

  • Discussion sessions: Presentations will be followed by a brief discussion session. You will all be expected to have read one another's outlines beforehand and to raise relevant questions during the discussion sessions.

  • Criteria for Evaluation: Presentations will be evaluated on the basis of organization, coherence, coverage of the items mentioned in (1), (2), and (3) above, your ability to observe time limits, and your ability to field questions raised in class about your work.

  • Some Pointers: PRACTICE your presentation. Time it carefully beforehand so that you know you can meet the time limits without rushing. If you're soft-spoken, you will need to make a conscious effort to speak up. Since most of us tend to talk very fast, it's a good idea to keep reminding yourself to slow down as you give your presentation. Feel free to refer to your notes occasionally, but don't stay glued to them. When you are talking about the problems or limitations that you see in your work at present, don't put yourself down. Evaluating one's own work is often difficult and requires skills that are well worth cultivating. It shouldn't be confused with self-deprecation, which is usually a defensive tactic, an unconscious habit, or both.

  • In the discussion period after your presentation, listen carefully to people's questions and responses and see if you can learn something from them. If the group has no substantive questions, bring up one of the questions that occurred to you when you were preparing your presentation, one that you thought your peers might ask and that you would like to talk about with them. Then, if they still fail to respond, that's their problem, not yours. You will have done your part and will have tried to help them do theirs.

[top of page]

 

[HOMEPAGE][SCHEDULE]-- [CLASS LIST][INTERNATIONAL WRITERS SERIES] - [STUDENT COMMENTS]

Site created and maintained by Cheryl Mares.
Updated: 20 October 1999